www.onlineselfrealization.com
Page 3
Probably the best write up on the secrets of huge number of Hindu Gods, since past 1000 years !
Lord Shiva is one of the trinity Gods, (Brahma, Vishnua and Mahesha-Shiva)
Most of the Indian Professors and Philosophers are fond of referring to foreign books and foreign authors on the Indian scriptures and philosophy. This is their tradition since British rule. They know the reasons better as to why they require foreign references and not the references of the great enlightened saints of India.
The writing or speech of any person has no spiritual value unless and until he is at least an Adhikari (well conversant and strict observer of the Sadhan Chatushtaya); he may not be a Jnani. Not only the professor turned Sadhus, but the great and celebrated thinkers of the world like Lokmany Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Bhahasyakara),Max Muller,Dr. S. RadhaKrishnan or anybody of that status can’t be called as Jnanis is strictest sense. Look at the crux of the work of Max Muller described in Wikipedia.
“For Müller, the culture of the Vedic peoples represented a form of nature worship <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_worship>, an idea clearly influenced by Romanticism. He saw the gods of the Rig-Veda as active forces of nature, only partly personified as imagined supernatural <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural> persons. From this claim Müller derived his theory that mythology is 'a disease of language'. By this he meant that myth transforms concepts into beings and stories. In Müller's view 'gods' began as words constructed in order to express abstract ideas, but were transformed into imagined personalities. Thus the Indo-European father-god appears under various names: Zeus <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeus>, Jupiter <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_(god)>, Dyaus Pita <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyaus_Pita>. For Müller all these names can be traced to the word 'Dyaus', which he understands to imply 'shining' or 'radiance'. This leads to the terms 'deva', 'deus', 'theos' as generic terms for a god, and to the names 'Zeus' and 'Jupiter' (derived from deus-pater). In this way a metaphor becomes personified and ossified. This aspect of Müller's thinking closely resembled the later ideas of Nietzsche <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nietzsche>”
The above is what Max Muller understood from his 4 decade study of Vedas and other Indian scriptures which is absolutely incorrect in the view of Jnani. It would have been better for him, had he surrendered to any Jnani Indian Guru and served him for a few years instead of spending so many years in translation. There are many mistakes in the famous book “GeetaRahasya” of Lokmanya, who was extra ordinary brilliant person of the world. Some of the contemporary scholars like Pundit Jog and others had pointed out those mistakes in their various articles and books. Jnani might give his straight opinion that Lokmanya was confused in understanding the meaning of Karma. Brilliance is not the only quality to attain the knowledge of God and Veda though it is necessary. Guru Sewa is a must. What Dr. RadhaKrishnan has written is the translation and the essays of no spiritual value. In the writings of the enlightened people like Bhagwan Shankaracharya, Saint Jnaneshwar, Saint Kabir, Saint Tulsidas, Saint Tukaram and other Jnanis, anybody (Jnani) finds God (BrahmaVastu) fully filled in each and every sentence of their writing. God is absent in the writings of the Professors and Philosophers, let them be celebrated and called the greatest knowledgeable persons by the nescient world.
The writing or speech of any person has no spiritual value unless and until he is at least an Adhikari (well conversant and strict observer of the Sadhan Chatushtaya); he may not be a Jnani. Not only the professor turned Sadhus, but the great and celebrated thinkers of the world like Lokmany Bal Gangadhar Tilak (Bhahasyakara),Max Muller,Dr. S. RadhaKrishnan or anybody of that status can’t be called as Jnanis is strictest sense. Look at the crux of the work of Max Muller described in Wikipedia.
“For Müller, the culture of the Vedic peoples represented a form of nature worship <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_worship>, an idea clearly influenced by Romanticism. He saw the gods of the Rig-Veda as active forces of nature, only partly personified as imagined supernatural <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural> persons. From this claim Müller derived his theory that mythology is 'a disease of language'. By this he meant that myth transforms concepts into beings and stories. In Müller's view 'gods' began as words constructed in order to express abstract ideas, but were transformed into imagined personalities. Thus the Indo-European father-god appears under various names: Zeus <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeus>, Jupiter <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_(god)>, Dyaus Pita <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyaus_Pita>. For Müller all these names can be traced to the word 'Dyaus', which he understands to imply 'shining' or 'radiance'. This leads to the terms 'deva', 'deus', 'theos' as generic terms for a god, and to the names 'Zeus' and 'Jupiter' (derived from deus-pater). In this way a metaphor becomes personified and ossified. This aspect of Müller's thinking closely resembled the later ideas of Nietzsche <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nietzsche>”
The above is what Max Muller understood from his 4 decade study of Vedas and other Indian scriptures which is absolutely incorrect in the view of Jnani. It would have been better for him, had he surrendered to any Jnani Indian Guru and served him for a few years instead of spending so many years in translation. There are many mistakes in the famous book “GeetaRahasya” of Lokmanya, who was extra ordinary brilliant person of the world. Some of the contemporary scholars like Pundit Jog and others had pointed out those mistakes in their various articles and books. Jnani might give his straight opinion that Lokmanya was confused in understanding the meaning of Karma. Brilliance is not the only quality to attain the knowledge of God and Veda though it is necessary. Guru Sewa is a must. What Dr. RadhaKrishnan has written is the translation and the essays of no spiritual value. In the writings of the enlightened people like Bhagwan Shankaracharya, Saint Jnaneshwar, Saint Kabir, Saint Tulsidas, Saint Tukaram and other Jnanis, anybody (Jnani) finds God (BrahmaVastu) fully filled in each and every sentence of their writing. God is absent in the writings of the Professors and Philosophers, let them be celebrated and called the greatest knowledgeable persons by the nescient world.
Copy Right Sugway 2008-2010
Total pages 13, Click at the bottom for next Page